The Spurious Emergence of Markan Priority
Various factors exercised influence in the development of a fundamentally misleading and false consensus of Markan Priority. The arguments are refuted here.
Mark Section
Various factors exercised influence in the development of a fundamentally misleading and false consensus of Markan Priority. The arguments are refuted here.
We examine 36 cases of two-stage embellishment, which indicate that Luke is the most primitive Gospel, that was rewritten by Mark and revised again in Matthew.
Examples of rewriting in Mark’s account of the episodes of Jesus’ last week reveal numerous instances where Mark restructured his story based on various motives
Existing manuscripts have 3 different endings of Mark. The earliest manuscripts are missing an ending. The lost ending is plausibly incorporated into John 21.
The editorial methodology of Mark is evidenced by examining the first chapter and instances of borrowing from other contexts of Luke-Acts throughout Mark.
There are numerous embellishments in Mark. Mark exhibits the expansionist characteristics of a Jewish midrashic or targumistic storyteller.
Mark resulted in a modified amplified text and an inauthentic dramatization of the Gospel story.