The Prologue of Luke
The Prologue of Luke Although the Gospel of Luke actually begins in verse five, it is the first four verses that provide us with evidence of its authenticity. While most …
The Prologue of Luke Although the Gospel of Luke actually begins in verse five, it is the first four verses that provide us with evidence of its authenticity. While most …
Luke did not try to expunge and blend his sources, particularly, his Semitic source as evidenced by the Semitisms of Special Luke
B.H. Streeter was pivotal toward establishing the modern “consensus”. Yet, he advocated that Proto-Luke, an early form of Luke, had priority over Mark.
Matthew’s dependence on Luke: Matthean Posteriority This article presents evidence for the author of Matthew having used Luke in the composition of the Gospel of Matthew. The view of Matthew …
The Sermon on the Mount is not a speech made by Jesus, but the literary work of the Evangelist who wrote Matthew. Matthew ethicizes and historizes the traditional material in light of a new situation. Regarding the emphasis of the Law in the Sermon on the Mount, these verses are largely Matthean compositions.s
Is Matthew a Judaizing Document? Evidence that numerous statements, exclusive to Matthew, are of a Judaizing quality.
There are numerous embellishments in Mark. Mark exhibits the expansionist characteristics of a Jewish midrashic or targumistic storyteller.
The order of the Synoptic Gospels is Luke->Mark->Matthew as indicated by a detailed statistical analysis. The analysis summarized validates Lukan Priority
Matthew is a derivative work that expands on and is a revision of Mark. Many Marcan defects are exhibited in Matthew.
Mark resulted in a modified amplified text and an inauthentic dramatization of the Gospel story.